Xtract One Technologies Inc. T.XTRA

cmr

[Rick311]

Does this one count?

https://patriot1tech.com/patscan/radar/

[mrpancake]

does it count for what. have you ever seen any ready to go , in use now, sold to client with photo and or video proof....poof nothing odd that they still refer to CMR  on the website at all

[Rick311]

Wouldn't the cmr page on their website be the first thing to go if they where trying to bury it.

[JCDTrent]

Exactly right Rick!  PAT1 is NOT trying to bury CMR.....companies remove old marketing materials all the time...if the company was trying to bury the CMR claims, the (newer CMR) pages on their website would be the first to go. This is just more "short and distort" tactics from these bottom feeders...find something old or make a  mountain out of molehill...or in this case, find

[KillinIt]

This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy

[mrpancake]

it does matter IMHO it never worked, won't ever work and  is included in the wbesite now - for fun not really  "a non-issue" as you say but rather  non sense.

[mrpancake]

Moreover,  they could have and should have let this  (CMR) go a year ago, as the capital was raised based on CMR certification for a weapons detection system; that system does not exist. That is why we see the shedding process going on now.  Will be an interesting week that for sure What next? 

[dontfollow]

How can they have a certificate for something that "doesnt exist"? You do realize that an independent test firm is testing the device and provides all data in the application? Are they also part of the ploy and never did a test? Hilarious.   

[mrpancake]

It "does not exist" because the certificate (see: https://fccid.io/2ALZTCMR) is for a through wall imager  where as the corporate news  ( see: https://patriot1tech.com/corporate-news/patriot-one-receives-fcc-approval-patscan-cmr-paving-way-commercial-roll/ ) says its a weapons detection system.  Can't be both.  test firm does not weight in on classification

[dontfollow]

So why can't a through-wall imaging system be used to detect weapons? Where is the limitation for that in the definition provided by the FCC? "Through-wall imaging system. A field disturbance sensor that is designed to detect the location or movement of persons or objects that are located on the other side of an opaque structure such as a wall or a ceiling." Is weapons not an

[BaronBuffett]

Old videos of CMR - gone New videos of CMR - coming (imo) CMR getting ready for commercial roll out - soon (imo)

[KillinIt]

This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy

[BaronBuffett]

Could be. PAT has not and will not give up working technology called the CMR. Or else it would be gone from their website -- and others, in fact. So, nice try, Team PATBash.

[Rick311]

thanks for the clarification

[JCDTrent]

Well said...donotfollow!

[Rick311]

Thats the company that posted about Rex Moore right?