Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Twin Butte Energy Ltd TBTEF

Twin Butte Energy Ltd is an oil and natural gas exploration, development and production company with properties located in Western Canada. The firm's operational assets have been sold to West Lake Energy Corp.


GREY:TBTEF - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Post by cigarbutt1on Mar 22, 2017 11:00pm
96 Views
Post# 26018146

RE:Why do you guys think tax benefits come with shares?

RE:Why do you guys think tax benefits come with shares? Right. Let's go back to business.

Without more substantial evidence. I would tend to think that there is value in the tax pools and that value is tied somehow to the shares (shell) of the company.
Even if Oldfart is right, the valuation exercise is interesting and, at the very least, the value of these assets were incorporated in the purchase price.

Thanks for the link. The article is mostly about non-capital losses. Disclosure versus amount and composition of tax pools for CDN O+G firms is variable. For TBE, disclosure about this stopped (my take) when they started to include a going concern uncertainty note. There was a reassessment (we were reminded of this on August 24th, 2016) for the 2011, 2014, 2015 and 2016 years relating to specific Scientific Research and Experimental Development tax deductions but amounts involved were small in comparison to previously disclosed tax pools amounts. Presumably, these SR&ED tax deductions were a minor portion of the tax pools.

I suggest the following link that has a section on successor  corporation rules. This is a very complex topic and I submit that, with present disclosures, it is impossible to tell for sure if the tax pools have been acquired/transferred with the assets or if those tax pools can be transferred/acquired in a separate subsequent transaction. I lean to the latter.

https://www.pwc.com/ca/en/energy-utilities/publications/pwc-oil-gas-taxation-2012-10-en.pdf

I also suggest the following link that was published when perhaps we had sunny ways. Interestingly, what the author sees as a relative weakness for TBE (ie tax shield would not last long versus the low cover ratio), I see as a relative advantage because TBE had a relatively high ratio of tax pools in relation to its enterprise value and had relatively high cash flow torque meaning that under a better pricing environment, the tax shield could be used much more rapidly ie a lower discounting factor for the tax pools.

https://www.pwc.com/ca/en/energy-utilities/publications/pwc-oil-gas-taxation-2012-10-en.pdf

Enough for now.

Bullboard Posts

USER FEEDBACK SURVEY ×

Be the voice that helps shape the content on site!

At Stockhouse, we’re committed to delivering content that matters to you. Your insights are key in shaping our strategy. Take a few minutes to share your feedback and help influence what you see on our site!

The Market Online in partnership with Stockhouse