Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Twin Butte Energy Ltd TBTEF

Twin Butte Energy Ltd is an oil and natural gas exploration, development and production company with properties located in Western Canada. The firm's operational assets have been sold to West Lake Energy Corp.


GREY:TBTEF - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Post by cigarbutt1on Apr 01, 2017 1:52pm
153 Views
Post# 26063041

Re: Canadian development expense...

Re: Canadian development expense... Expertchoc,
I respect your opinion and the time spent but I have spent some time also filling this knowledge hole lately. Somehow, I hope you are right. But.
I understand that Oldfart provided useful info here but his last related message end up with a question mark. 
Would like to hear Kasparovisme on this but my take now is that the purchaser, in buying essentially all oil and gas "properties", was able, with the Receiver's assent, to transfer the associated tax pools (unused expenses which likely comprised most/all of available and useful tax pools). The Successor rules seem to treat a share sale and a substantially all assets sale on the same basis ie in substance, the properties changed owner and the tax pools followed.
Yes, with the purchase price allocation (detailed form not available now to outside of insiders), assets have been allocated a new value on the balance sheet of the buyer but, if anything, my take is that the tax pools available became lower in value as some assets purchased were stepped-up on the purchaser's books in order to maximize tax deductible expenses going forward. (Compare Q2 financials with your evaluation of purchase price). 
I continue to think that the value of the pools to be around 10-20 millions but that value was likely reflected in the purchase price.
My take, for what it's worth.

Bullboard Posts

USER FEEDBACK SURVEY ×

Be the voice that helps shape the content on site!

At Stockhouse, we’re committed to delivering content that matters to you. Your insights are key in shaping our strategy. Take a few minutes to share your feedback and help influence what you see on our site!

The Market Online in partnership with Stockhouse