RE:RE:RE:RE:Here's what I'm readingThere is no one sided cheerleading. Everyone is welcome to express an opinion here, but it must be backed up with FACTS. And that is doubly true if you present yourself as an "expert". (In unrelated news, nobody pays for equity research anymore, even if it is good.)
You are clearly a very amateur investor (although you might be a pro at predicting toothpaste sales for Shoppers). That is fine, because we were all young and niive once too. However, it is not co-incidental that everyone with a functioning brain is on the same side with this stock.
We have literally proven that you don't know the ABC's of investing (such as "what is debt"). You read the press release at a Grade 3 level (imaginary 3-year term). Are you even literate?
I feel bad for you because you are clearly the product of a failed education system. You are not a master at anything, but you paid some bureacratic institution to tell you that. Here is a fact that we have all observed: You are a below amateur stock picker. You have no right to charge people money for your "analysis". Because you haven't even read through Investopedia, let alone write a CFA exam.
We are not judging you for that though. Because all of us didn't know what debt was either at one point in time (although I was reading these things when I was 14, while you must be in your mid 20s and learning about it now). We are trying to help you. But you are so egotistical you don't even realize that you don't know the most basic things. You think you are a master, but you are completely incompetent.
I wish there was a nicer way to say that. These are hard truths, but I suspect nobody has told you these things before. I am not angry. I am trying to help you by telling you the truth. But you will only hear what you want to.
ARIMA11 wrote: Great point.
"It's the one sided chearleading that smacks desperation and novice investing." If we can't have a healthy debate on this board and invite contribution by all we have a serious problem. The quality of the discussion suffers and it does not do any good to anyone.
Alanmakingcents wrote: Whippet, fair enough and I noticed the chap used cumulative deficit and debt incorrectly. But he did admit to that. True, he didn't change his conclusion but that was his view. My question is why didn't you and others call out posters for "lying" about profitability or any number of other misstatements made over the last six months that I have been following. I repeat, one sided cheerleading smacks of desperation and novice investing. It is a tell of suspect stocks to many seasoned investors.
ps: profanity and bullying is another tell.
Alan