Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Afri-Can Marine Minerals Corporation V.AFA



TSXV:AFA - Post by User

Post by kegastonon Jun 11, 2007 8:58am
304 Views
Post# 12922009

Luckyme 1 - Learn to read...

Luckyme 1 - Learn to read...Luckyme 1, where did you find that quote where AFA talk about average diamond size of 0.146 CT You know that when you make these type of comments you are deliberately lying ... right ??.. So what can be the goal of a poster that spread lies ???? Now I took you at your words, where you mentioned that in the January Press release they talk about average diamond size of 0.146... and I could not found any reference to that effect....all that I found is the following quote from the January Press release were the number 0.146 is mentioned and included it below…. “…However, it has been shown historically that the device used for the phase 1 sampling has regularly understated the grades and diamond content of deposits. In addition, it is documented that the device used for the phase 2 program was unable to penetrate and adequately sample the diamondiferous sediments lying deeper in the geological column. Therefore it is expected that modern, more accurate sampling technology will indicate higher grades than those shown by the phase 1 and phase 2 sampling. To simulate this, applying the average recovered grade of the best 20 per cent of the samples (0.146 carat per sq m) suggests a potential diamond content of 1.6 million carats. These figures only apply to the lag-gravels adjacent to the outcrop of the basal tertiary sediments. There is further potential on block J in the other geological environments described in the report.” Now, all can see that when luckyme1 talk about the 0.146 ct, she deliberately forget the per square meters and therefore when she mentioned that AFA diamond have no value, she deliberately confused Apples from Oranges….to make a point... Now, let ask the board, either she is just so stupid that she does not understand the difference between carat size and carat distribution or is she deliberately confusing them to belittle the story ??? Read all the warning sign about pumper and basher and you will notice that they always use partial truth to make their points.. So in Conclusion… She is nothing more then a basher , that has no argument that hold water..
Bullboard Posts