RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Hit Bottom?OBJECTIVE????? What a fricking joke you are Treetop. There is absolutely nothing objective about your so-called analysis. All that you do is state the extremely obvious negatives and completely ignore the positives. Your bias in beyond negative. It is completely one-sided and completely unbalanced. What's an even bigger joke is what you recently called your "lottery ticket" picks, CAP, IXR, GBL, and TPN. All of these deals are company's that trade even more thinly then AGG, have a lower SP than AGG, all are way behind AGG in terms of project development, nowhere even close to a FS and don't even come close to having enough cash to get there. Yet you think these company's are more worth a punt than AGG???? Then you're over on the SMF board questioning valuation based on bottomline profit and have no clue about the free cash flow metric for valuation?? Yes, you are truly an analytical wizard Treetop. Once again I state I have no problem with balanced contrary opinions based on documented fact but I do have a problem with completely negative skewed opinions that are backed up by half truths or outright omission of facts from idiots who post on a board when they don't even own the stock.