Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Alexander's Inc V.ALX


Primary Symbol: ALX

Alexander's, Inc. is a real estate investment trust (REIT). The Company is engaged in leasing, managing, developing and redeveloping its properties. It is managed by, and its properties are leased and developed by, Vornado Realty Trust (Vornado). It has five properties in New York City consisting of 731 Lexington Avenue, a 1,079,000 square foot multi-use building comprising the entire block bounded by Lexington Avenue, East 59th Street, Third Avenue and East 58th Street in Manhattan; Rego Park I, a 338,000 square foot shopping center, is located on Queens Boulevard and 63rd Road in Queens; Rego Park II, a 616,000 square foot shopping center, is located adjacent to the Rego Park I shopping center in Queens; Flushing, a 167,000 square foot building, located on Roosevelt Avenue and Main Street in Queens, and The Alexander apartment tower, located above its Rego Park II shopping center, contains 312 units aggregating 255,000 square feet.


NYSE:ALX - Post by User

Comment by righand2on Nov 18, 2016 4:36pm
243 Views
Post# 25483091

RE:RE:RE:RE:wildwood, share your wisdom

RE:RE:RE:RE:wildwood, share your wisdom
07wildwood wrote: Perhaps an increase in the size of the offering. If I recall Spartan had done that once before. They could use the funds to decrease the size of their debt. Would not be a bad idea. 


From what I heard, the underwriters weren't taking up the over-allotment option, let alone increasing the size of the offering. That seems strange to me, as the original offering was over-subscribed. I guess if the share price jumps 20%, they might reconsider.
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>