RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Volume Precedes price !!Verbatim,
A few things:
=THERE IS NO BID FROM CUNNINGHAM.....not even close
- we know Cunningham runs a $2.5 million delinquent filing company on the OTC. Cunningham is so proud of it, he even changed the name to CUnningham
-HNHRC sets up private cos all the time..........and it aint cuz theyre well funded...........just more of the russian doll theme weve seen with them over the years....they mostly end up in the same place....
-if cunningham mining shell had any cash, trust me when I say they woulda told us............
-cunninghams delinquent filing are bad enough, but their pie in the sky fluff NRs take the cakes.........always good for a laug
- in plain english, cunningham got AMK to agree to a no shop period with CUnningham givin nuthin in return
THERE IS A REASON THAT TUD AND TUO ARE DOWN 20%+ ON THE CUNNINGHAM'D NONBINGIND NONBID!
MrVerbatim9800 wrote: Hey Larry..... Since Cunningham mining is a private company and the only company listed in the LOI to purchase AMK at .43. How would you know what their financial situation is or, who their third party investor's are (if they needed one)? You have no idea and, that's a fact.
LOI's aren't essentially a buyout offer? As you stated here, they are. "the potential of other properties, assuming it does not rise too far in tandem with the AMK buyout level"
AMK is not locked out of negotiating and entertaining other offers if they are unsolicited by AMK. Pretty standard.
A break fee if AMK accepts an offer from another entity? That would be factored into the purchase, so who cares. Pretty standard. The termination clause period is for nine months from the date of the LOI, not a year as you incorrectly stated, again.
This can absolutely be a yes or no situation. Once due dilgence is completed the decision can be made in an instant with a vote completed by the shareholder majority (AMK and Sprot). You cerntainly wouldn't hold any weight in a decision since, by your own excited admission, you don't own any shares of AMK
People, this is a tactic by Larry and other Larry's like him....... First, they try to beat you down with unrelenting, repetative and manipulative spins of the truth or complete lies (gaslighting). Then (this is where Larry is at now) they give you the impression that they are empathizing with you and agreeing with you just a little bit (while still providing manipulative statements based on non-fact) to gain your trust and to undermine those who are undermining his attempts at manipulating the shareholders, potential shareholders and the price of a stock (spreading fear and confusion while still gaslighting you).
Larry, give it a break, kiddo....... Your tactics are obvious and still week...
V