RE: anthillActually Ant. read my first post to you 5/30/2007. I actually was defending you giving you the benefit of the doubt. I am not here to pick fights with anyone. However your constant crying over the lack of a "clarification" has become annoying especially since it has been
clarified at least for now. Are you not reading the articles posted? For the last time, he said he was refering to the oil and gas industry when he made his comment about 70-80%. I have answered your questions. No where is there a mining policy taking 70-80%. You now have documentation from today stating Mexico, Brazil, Argentina etc. etc. etc. mining royalties and their laws. You have not answered my question. Where on earth does there exist a country taking 70-80% of anything??? Why would the Equadorians be the first? What would they accomplish by doing this??? Answer these questions. They have been asked of you enough times by many posters. Everyone else on this board seems satisfied with the politcs. Are we all naieve fools. Are you the only real knowledagable investor? If I was you being so knowedgable about S.A. politcs, so convinvced that there is truth to the 70-80% tax I would have dropped this stock in a heart beat after the news came out. After all if you are right and they do come out with the 70-80 then this stock will drop like a stone. Why would any supposed knowledgable investor take such a risk?
Finally regarding my "pumping drivel" as I said to you earlier. If believing in a stock having upside and disagreeing with your lame argument re politcs si pumping then you really need to pay more attention. No where have I made any predictions re price, buyouts or spectacular results comming, just that I believe I will make money here. Yeah thats real pumping.
You Ant fall into one of three categories. You are a basher which I could care less about. You are the type that would argue the world is flat just to try and prove you are right. Or you are very new to this and need your hand held.