RE:RE:RE:So, this is interesting and encouraging for next year.Regardless of solvent recovery these projects will be costlier than the one axe is currently developing. It seens frustrating that there is a process right here right now on the cusp and people want to do every other thing but further develop this one. Now the key is what Geoff said he clearly states it is tough to get industry players to shift off of what they already know works to something that has yet be proven that will work too. So sagd is what is proven using solvents to cut the amount of steam per barrel of oil is the step in between what axe is doing as far as i can see as a lay person. I do believe that the solvents will work there is no doubt in my mind about that but even if as the goal is to cut ghg by 50 percent and costs 40 to 50 percent things are not adding up as to what axe is saying. So if sagd with solvents does what axe is looking to do without them it wikl mean either the solvents hit 50 percent ghg reduction woth axes calculations if beinf 50 percent is low or that with solvents their 50 percent is off with axes claim. There is 0 possibility that the safd with sopvents will reach what axe is doing as there is still steam per varrel being produced whereas 0 with axe. The issue of usage of solvents will also require storage ans pumping costs so again there is no way the sagd d with solvents will equal costs what axe has projected out the only thibg is it is a proven tech vs one that needs to get there. Axe is the way better of all that is being tapped and when it is proven that is where the huge value is and after all the toils and challenfes and all that has and still comes with all that axe is doing it should not be given cheaply. If people fairlt worjed with tge company and were sincere as much as i would vote down all that i said in my hearr of heart if one dealt fairly even if there were a bettee offer i would say give it to those who walked with you in being sincere genuine and fair that is my heart part of me not the cold business one of me another reason i am getting off the boards. I feel if i say nothing have 0 influence impact on others regardless of negligable or not there is 0 personal emotion of heart and ego as well as 0 nanipulation on my part to whatever extent that may be even if negligable 0 anything i simply just buy and sell according to trigger points and strategically build. Yes it will be tough initially because i am passionate and chatty but to stay neutral do my thing i cant be present in the posting sense. But i will love to read what peoppe say if i am able to resist posting if not i will need to stay off almost completely...the presence is to communicate to people who know how to take eesponsibility handle their shares and consider suggestions without blaming and likewise me doing the same not blaming any for tips because at the end of the day as i once said several times in the past every hand is a winner every hand is a loser you got to know when to walk away and know when to run when you coubt your money at the table when the dealing is done. I am sure i screwed this up but sage advice from Kenny Rogers The Gambler love the song one of my favorites. I think i watched bits and pieces of the movie. But folks this is all gambling and to make money we need to be careful.. the issue of smart not smart is not huge here because i suspect many people hardly read and understand the financials put money as Buffet would in terms of management growth potential etc all of which he would not do unless the companies are better capitalized. So with pennies even with the blue chips take the darn profot when it is there best thing i should myself listen to and definitely if i have a plan stick to it. I talk about this and aurora as they are my only two holdings two went down for all intent and purposes pqe and arto...not impressed but i handled them badly on me regardless. I have a strategy with acu aurora. I said to myself i will not add anymore shares beyond a .03 average it has an ask of .03 bid of .025 depending if i mathematically work out in what i have and however many i may buy it cant cross .03 my feeling is due to commission and the quantity i can likely afford my average will be either .03 or .035. I am not going to get busted up if i buy or not i have 4500 at .03...i dont care about value but strategy. I have said to myself i will keep a maximum 1000 but this is not a sure thing. And i am looking at no less than initially a double but i will not take a double if it hits it as i said i am looking more ideally at .10 however if it doubles and pulls back to .045 or .05 from .06 i will likely sell 2000 not much money but depending less commission it is $80 to $90 of a $134.99 spent. I have 2500 left if i am looking not to lose and take a small profit .04 would be my sell all. Less commission $90 so $170 to $180 not much but i didnt lose and i bought time and possibility for the stock to move up so what i am doing as people say covering my top and bottom. As mentioned i will also raise the floor so if .03 is base goes to .045 i can put the floor at .035 or wait as i said for .06 sell off at .045 to .05 almost working the similar way of going in raising the bottom but the point is to reduce potential lose and increase profit and so that is what i will do with all other stocks with the exception of this one...again nothing moves under $2 i will decide more as it reaches there. My time on the boards continues to rapidly approach and as before i continue to enjoy sharing thoughts with everyone. Happy Monday all enjoy your week :-)