Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

AXE EXPLORATION INC V.AXQ

"Axe Exploration Inc is a Canadian based exploration stage company. It is engaged in the business of acquiring, exploring and developing of mining properties and also holds interests in properties at the exploration stage located in Canada. It has interests in four properties, which are located in Quebec, mainly in Abitibi area. Its properties include Destorbelle Property, Commandant Property, Gold Peak Property and Unique Property."


TSXV:AXQ - Post by User

Post by Manakai00on Oct 13, 2018 12:04am
127 Views
Post# 28793503

Math 101

Math 101Without Prejudice:

If there ever was a definition of a bad deal here it is folks.

I called Terranada’s office and spoke with the CFO.

The opening price if the deal goes through is proposed
to be .50 cents.

Let’s do the math....
Using a shareholders position of 160,000 
Before this was halted it traded at .06 cents 
With a value of 6 X 160,000 shares = $9,600
Ater the rollback of 1 new for 16 old gives the 
shareholder 160,000 divided by 16 = 10,000 
new Terranada shares with a value of $5,000.

And they have the audacity of saying after their 
AGM that they will be working hard for shareholder 
value.

I personally I am livid as I believe there is a greed factor
involved here at the rollback number of 1 for 16 !!!

There was a mere 57 million outstanding shares 
with a fairly health bank account so why stick ir
to the shareholders???

M.

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>