Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Azteca Gold Corp V.AZG

Gold and silver exploration


TSXV:AZG - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by Libertygon Sep 12, 2009 1:43pm
182 Views
Post# 16300486

RE: RE: Weird, Weird World of AZG...

RE: RE: Weird, Weird World of AZG...THEY WERE VERY FORWARD AND MISLEADING. FOR EXAMPLE A company SHOULD NOT say it has a SULLIVAN type ore body with only one drill hole

Your post is misleading. You are ASSUMING that they are in trouble for forward looking statements, pure conjecture, and unknowable as the results of this halt are in darkness. Show in any NR where AZG stated they HAVE a sullivan type or body. They stated the similarities the grades, and the bedding expectations. Also these forward looking statements can not be dismissed as incorrect until they have completed the drill holes. What if they do end up with what they originally expected and stated. That's still to be determined, and still implied, either they will prove it or not, but you can't say yea or nay with any certainty with what is now known, it grades as incomplete at present. They still appear to believe this will be a bedded/lense type deposit, not a vein type. The proof is in the pudding but NOT disproven, nor proven, YET.

Making these judgements without the conclusion are farts in the wind. The beauty of this is the halt will end and the results will be released and then the truth will be known.

Heres what you know:

AZG states the halt is not serious in it's resulting review of AZG nor will show AZG in trouble for it's actions. It will have to clarify some statements etc., and Matt won't be the QP. Basically a whole lot to do about nothing. If AZG is implying this then you can confirm it very easily once the halt ends, then you know if you were told the truth or not.

AZG states it has assays ready for release.

AZG states they have encountered mineralization to what degree is unknown.

There's more but this info is being presented so if you want to know who is credible or not see if the results of the halt correspond with what you have been told, or at least those of you who are interested enough in your investment to actually call or contact the source. AZG has offered plenty of info to allow an investor to know following the halt how credible this information is and has been.

Or you could listen to Nit Wits like angelnicky asking "what do you mean by slaughtered" DUH. or this oldie but goodie "can anyone confirm Matt has left the country" Now thats some real credible stuff, maybe inspired by a mind altering idiot drug. Stick with what is known and let the rest sit until you can intelligently make a determination. Lots of twisted words and facts on this board from some real low brow characters.
Bullboard Posts