RE:RE:RE:Yet Again . Who Says A Mine RayJay67 wrote: Schocer , You know damn well the huge sediment deposit at depth exists but has not been proven out yet. We know it's there as they hit the edge of just one plate of seven last summer and came out at .44% CU and was still open at depth due to a drilling malfunction.1% is considered high grade. That one plate alone is 6 kms or 6 million square meters. If we were to get roughly 2% CU at only 24M of thickness, ( It could also go much deeper.. couldn’t it.. ) The numbers would be staggering to say the least.. I would low ball it and just go with the 6k x1k x24m x 2.65 (avr. CU sulfide density value) Please enlighten us and tell us what kind of dollars you would put on a deposit such as this ? Heck you could even apply the .44% CU, just to give a range. TIA Please reply accordingly to this question with no nonsense....
Hey Ray still no answer? No surprise... Schocor pretends to know a lot but has nothing as evidenced by his lack of response not to mention his lack of facts in any of his posts... I was playing with some numbers and have approximated the total of the 7 Known plates to being 6750m x 4150 m and we know hole 10 caught the edge and identified a 2m interval of 0.44% CU.. they also stated in the same release that they had a 68 m interval of mineralization.. thought they did not expound upon that..suffice perhaps that would be easier for them to answer.. if not I’ll be only to happy to do so later.. GLTA!