RE:RE:RE:At what point should Wanklyn be turfed?if it is true he turned down the summer time M&A offer then yes i think he should be.
his lack of buying of company shares is disturbing and it is harming investors.
compare pipestone's poor performance to other direct peers (kelt, spartan, nva) and i would say if you reflect on that it is a good reason to consider replacing paul wanklyn.
just my 2 cents.
i think riverstone is a problem too.