RE:RE:RE:News on BS-3 assays released!Results were not bad they were good for what was expected. We or most of us knew
this hole did not reach target depth or had the right angle beforehand. So it’s no surprise. But BCU set them selves up for a reaction like this with assays and met testing at SGS Lakefield. Market may have looked at the Cu grades alone and the depths and the time it will take until the next set of results after BS-4 is done… what September maybe, and bailed. I would like to see Cu equivalents posted and some maps as well. I would also like to see a second drill set up concurrently with BS-4 this summer.
What were the Rhenium and Molybdenum recoveries like from the SGS samples? No mention of these aspects or the reason for sending flotation requests to Lakefield. It’s as if he knows he’s already onto something FCX will want to know all about and he’s playing keep away. Weird. But if that were the case wouldn’t you add a second rig this summer? And why the met tests on BS-3? why not wait until they penetrate the leach cap for sure?