BLACKROCK Municipal Income TRUST V.BFK.P

Primary Symbol: BFK

BlackRock Municipal Income Trust (the Fund) is a diversified closed-end management investment company. The Fund's investment objective is to provide current income exempt from federal income taxes. Under normal market conditions, the Fund invests at least 80% of its managed assets in investments the income from which is exempt from federal income tax (except that the interest may be subject to the alternative minimum tax). The Fund may invest directly in securities or synthetically through the use of derivatives. The Fund's investment policies provide that it invests at least 80% of its total assets in investment grade quality municipal obligations issued by or on behalf of states, territories and possessions of the United States and their political subdivisions, agencies or instrumentalities, each of which pays interest that, in the opinion of bond counsel to the issuer, is excludable from gross income for federal income tax purposes. Its investment adviser is BlackRock Advisors, LLC.

NYSE:BFK - Post by User

BLACKROCK Municipal Income TRUST > Adam Arviv Helped Broker Redecan Deal

<< Previous

Bullboard Posts

Next >>

Comment by VeritasVernon Feb 07, 2022 1:49pm

118 Views

Post# 34405562

RE:RE:RE:Adam Arviv Helped Broker Redecan Deal

Random, Quin is a limited knowlege, married to Hexo investor at all costs. He won't respond because he is clueless. The guy bought HIP shares, held and that stock is now worth 1.3 cents, his HIP warrants are essentially worthless. Thanks for pointing out Q's BS on this as some of us have been doing that for years now but the longs continue to follow him and incredibly have been cost averaging down from $10 to current levels..... LOL

RandomGuy25 wrote: Just restating that this is directly in response to quinlash stating that Arviv is a criminal. Quinlash did not respond initially. Quinlash?

1. You are correct that it is wrong for him to call the deal unfair. Sophisticated individuals have to rely on their legal protections, rather than any representations made during a transaction that were not included as representations and warranties within the transaction documentation. Such representations are irrelevant in a transaction between sophisticated parties.
2. Adam's conduct is not criminal, and so I appreciate that you stated your opinion is humble, but it is simply erroneous. I would chalk this up to hyperbole, but you are recommending people complain to the OSC and SEC. That is ridiculous. I recommend you reconsider your "humble" opinion on this item, actually show some humiilty, and acknowledge that there is no evidence of any criminal activity. It is one thing to question someone's ethics or motivation, but entirely another one to accuse them of criminal behaviour. You completely discredit yourself in every possible way through such a libellous accusation.

Disclaimer: I have never met Adam Arviv. I do not know Adam Arviv directly. I have no perspective on his ethics or business acumen, aside from a limited one developed through examining his public statements. I am not trying to defend his conduct. I just think that accusing people of criminal behaviour without evidence, without any explanation, and without any understanding of the law is fundamentally wrong and disgusting.