Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

BLACKROCK Municipal Income TRUST V.BFK.P


Primary Symbol: BFK

BlackRock Municipal Income Trust (the Fund) is a diversified closed-end management investment company. The Fund's investment objective is to provide current income exempt from federal income taxes. Under normal market conditions, the Fund invests at least 80% of its managed assets in investments the income from which is exempt from federal income tax (except that the interest may be subject to the alternative minimum tax). The Fund may invest directly in securities or synthetically through the use of derivatives. The Fund's investment policies provide that it invests at least 80% of its total assets in investment grade quality municipal obligations issued by or on behalf of states, territories and possessions of the United States and their political subdivisions, agencies or instrumentalities, each of which pays interest that, in the opinion of bond counsel to the issuer, is excludable from gross income for federal income tax purposes. Its investment adviser is BlackRock Advisors, LLC.


NYSE:BFK - Post by User

Comment by HaulJockeyon Oct 22, 2022 7:55pm
44 Views
Post# 35041448

RE:Brand vs. Celebrity

RE:Brand vs. Celebrity STUPID, STUPID, STUPID!

The person responsable for the ears should be fired, period. Even fans of Mike were not impressed with ear biting. NEVER, NEVER, NEVER use a commonly agreed negative to develop a possitive. Marketing 101. A gummy could have been in the shape of a fist, or a drink called "Knockout Punch". You're welcome.



quinlash wrote: Tyson 2.0 is both a brand and the name of a celebrity therefore it would not be allowed under current Canadian Canabis Regulations.  I would speculate Tyson's product would have to be rebranded to a name similar such as "T2" in order to get around the requirement.

As for the "Mike Bites" edible product...  maybe it could retain it's shape however the safest move on part of HEXO Corp would be to reform the product into a generic gummy and rename it to something like "T2-Bites"... maybe "T2-Nibblers".. that's kind of catchy 

.. it's pretty simple IMHO...  I see no need to expand beyond that



** No claim will be made on my part if HEXO Corp should proceed with either of these off the cuff product name suggestions.




<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>