Comment by
Henrich428 on Aug 26, 2021 10:03am
Just realised, his mistake arose from a numeric coincidence between the 400 upgraded tons that HDLR supposes in the pictures, + the addition of the "400"-ton, but unupgraded, pile.
Comment by
Henrich428 on Aug 26, 2021 12:48pm
Just saw HDLR's rationale, no guessing from pictures, she quotes p.6 of the MDNA: "Processing will treat the _400 tons_ of _Ore-Sorted_ mineralization currently stored at the mine."
Comment by
Henrich428 on Aug 26, 2021 1:16pm
Sorry Tinhos I expressed myself badly, as you say they are 1-ton bags so 64 tons in bags at best. I just wrote "bags" but was also thinking HDLR may have been counting the huge ore-pile.