RE:RE:Environmental MinisterWeavers MLA website has some amazing detail on Booker in one of his recent blogs. Worth a read. His most recent question in the house (a couple of days later) on Booker to Heyman is interesting now that I have actually read the script rather than just a political commentary on it. Heyman's response is actually quite detailed but still disappointing. Obviously he knew the question in advance. I think there is a pretty strong relationship between Mr. Weaver, the Premier, the Speaker and I presume, the Environment Minister (even though they are not members of the same party). For this issue to reach the floor of the legislature says a lot... And this is great for BKM. But I don't know how to interpret the answers from the Mining Minister (in March) and now the Environment Minister. Is it stonewalling and more of the same old delay tactics? Is it a subtle message to the bureaucracy to deal with this matter? I don't really get it. Has the EAO really provided clarity in terms of their expectations for BKM to fill in the final details of their report? What a weird scenario...