Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Pacific Booker Minerals Inc V.BKM

Alternate Symbol(s):  PBMLF

Pacific Booker Minerals Inc. is a Canada-based natural resource exploration company. The Company's principal business activity is the exploration of its mineral property interests, with its principal mineral property interests located in Canada. The Company is in the advanced stage of exploration of the Morrison deposit, a porphyry copper/gold/molybdenum ore body, located approximately 35 kilometers (km) north of Granisle, British Columbia and situated within the Babine Lake Porphyry Copper Belt. It has a 100% interest in certain mineral claims located contiguous to the Morrison claims. The Company is proposing an open-pit mining and milling operation for the production of copper/gold/silver concentrate and molybdenum concentrate. It is located within 29 km of two former producing copper mines, Bell and Granisle. The Company also holds a 100% interest in certain mineral claims located in the Omineca District of the Province of British Columbia.


TSXV:BKM - Post by User

Comment by bkmholderon Dec 09, 2021 12:49pm
142 Views
Post# 34215043

RE:WTF

RE:WTFI personally don't understand why the halts have been too long but I disagree the goal posts have been moved. It's clear that the decision will now/soon be in the Ministers' hands. And it has also been made explicitly clear the decision is being made based on what was provided in 2015 and nothing since then. 

The November 3rd letter includes the following re: option 2:
Option 2 would result in the further assessment process as outlined in the Further Assessment Order coming to an end with Ministers moving to make a decision on whether or not to issue and EA Certificate based solely on existing information provided for the 2015 decision.

If Ministers select option 2, the first step would be to notify PBM and Indigenous nations that the Further Assessment Order has been rescinded. The EAO would then provide the 2015 decision materials to Ministers for their decision on whether or not to issue an EA Certificate. The EAO noted to all parties that proceeding to a decision without completion of the further assessment process would mean that Ministers would be making a decision based solely on existing information provided for the 2015 decision

If the Ministers' were to make a decision and include a reference to the recent happenings with FNs, that opens them up to another court challenge which IMO they would lose given how explicit they are here about it. 
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>