MAGMA - HEAVIESScadd area has seen a sodic intrusion
Which dilutes the minerals
Alwyn, Jerome, Rathburn... heavies begin to show again.
Inventus has tapped into the heavies.
Alwyn historicla shaft has the heavies, whether replacement washed in, or indigenous to the
erroded outcrops seen with in the enclave circle depression.
Scadding area... with under 200m drlls will not be tapping the magmas and heavies.
Heavies that are laden in lots of minerals, bound to micas and all the pyrites.
Thick, rich, mineralization.
What would the majors be interested in ?
Surficial overlay minerals or.... the magmas like this example from Sudbury ?
The deep seated magmas...
Does a junior tap a few more holes...
Assemble Alwyn with a prelim reosurce and do same with...
Scadd, North Pit, East pit, Glade + 20 - 46 ?
Our value would go far higher... lol
Inventus - lots of lands.... with a sneak peek of, how thy want to build it - Sudbury 2.0
SPJ - right beside Inventus... .with lots of lands too.
How does a junior provoke interest ?
They find the best location for the magmas... heavy mica and pyrite minerlaization.
Either at surface - north claims - or.. .they drill another 100m - 200m
into different geology... and hope for the magmas....
One spoken word.... of heavy mineralization on the east side -
similar grades or geology as the - Sudbury big boys, and Sudbury 2.0 is birthed.
Would a major want nearby juniors to drill deeper or stick to the replacement overlays ?
lol
One could argue all day long, whether Sudbury recieved a meteor or... Lake Wanapetei is a former low lying volcano - and... to be fair.. one would have ot explain away why so many large Sudbury miners are all around the - ovid - on outter perimeter mining vs at the heart of the supposed meteor impact... if meteor impact, there wouldn't be a natural starigraphy disposition - it would look entirely different in lenses.
BUT... try explaining away all the numerous salts...lol
Which volcanos do spit out.
And... silts at bottom of Wanapetei that are 35m deep.
There also this photo where one can see the actual - interior - of the real basin - and not the added boundary lines that over emphasize the supposed impact - if one only factors the interior melt... it becomes an entriely differrnt subject to discuss...
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Bill-Keller-4/publication/303471034/viewer/AS:367493278388225@1464628633279/background/3.png Which brings into question - Lake Wanapetei -
lots of salts... silcia salt overlay... northern watershed, and replacement deposits.
And the - what if ?
What if eastern Sudbury, Lake Wanapetei... has the same geology as Sudbury's big miners just below the sodic replacement lense ?
Again... 200m holes won't tel lteh full story...
But, 300m - 400m would.
Again... if Inventus's cores show the heavies...
Then... what if this region around Rathburn and Alwyn and Jerome...
also have the heavies below the replacement geology ?
The magma geology... is where the good stuff is.
Tad further down...
Like i said... if a junior triangulated the best zone to dril lfor this magma in realation to comparing wanapetei and sudbury larger miners and " assumed " it has to be same on other east side- where then.. .would the magmas be ? wink.
