RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: re Angiochem.... bd, re "Amillionorbust. The potential here is ENORMOUS. Read the post . etc" in reply to and apparenetly trying to play down amb's "Much more efficacious? More like a barely registerable blip..." post
What amb simply pointed out is that the efficacious-ness suggested by a small blip is NOT in any way proven yet, and, if you have any faith in management, that is exactly what Rob said in the video. Are you suggesting Rob doesn't know what is statistically significant, or do you feel that any realism must always be countered with posts of extravagant hope?
Let's just avoid the hype shall we and stick to the facts, we don't want the price to cycle through boom and bust, step-by-step de-risking and staying ahead of the competittion will do fine.