Two-siders Beenthere said, "If JD says it's so ... Then it must be"
Well, you see, here's the difference.
beenthere, digitel and others remain involved with Bioasis. They're here posting and I assume they own shares. But I think they're as scared about losing the argument as they are about losing money.
Simply put, they choose to play both sides of the argument, "Bioasis is a failure but I still want to own the shares."
It's cowardly and intellectually dishonest, besides being hilarious when the "arguments" are invented tripe and 20/20 hindsight.
I've stayed on the side of the angels with only one simple argument that even the bozos believe - xB3 is an extremely valuable technology that will break through, sooner than later.
I think I'm right and I'm not going anywhere.
I will remind these two-siders who can't take a stand, who have to make both arguments because of some macho alpha dog BS, of my unequivocal one-sided support for Bioasis and xB3, not for CEOs and directors, but for the shareholders and the xB3 platform.
It's simple. If you think that xB3 will not succeed and have its apparent value expressed then you should sell. It is cowardly to take opposing sides of any argument in the hope that you will be recognized for being right when one or the other side of the argument comes true.
jdstox