RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:ProtalixI agree, Aarcol, we should never speculate about speculative events or speculative relationships that could speculatively influence speculative investing in speculative stocks.
Given that there are no stock forums for stocks that are entirely resolved, that is, stocks that have no future, I wonder why you read stock forums at all, Aarcol.
Why torture yourself with disgusting speculations about speculative events or speculative relationships that could speculatively influence speculative investing in speculative stocks?
But I did speculate that you knew the answer to the question about the Chiesi/Protalix partnership. You know it still exists, like we all do. And that, of course, is why you wouldn't answer the question. Makes your other post look beyond silly.
jd