Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bravo Gold Corp V.BVG

A mineral exploration company


TSXV:BVG - Post by User

Comment by goldmember2on Nov 28, 2008 5:32pm
284 Views
Post# 15617490

RE: gm2

RE: gm2No i didn't...I was just throwing out a hypothetical situation, but one that was similar to some of the recent drilling, such that other people could try their own calculations. I just focussed on a shorter, higher grade scenario, but the basic math I used can be applied to any scenario. I longer, lower grade intercept will obviously yield more tonnes and more gold, but one also needs to consider what a cut-off grade might be...a few g/t Au in a pit environment, but maybe 10 g/t or greater in an underground operation, in which case all the sub-10 g/t material might, unfortunately end up being non-recoverable.

But let's worry about that later once a pre-feas study is done with the new resource.

It's nice that at least one junior in BC is doing OK!

gm2
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>