RE:Strange demands from GSLRsmashedpotatoes wrote: 1) CCB cooperate with giving GSLR experts in hydrology, agronomy, and forestry access to the Miller site, as supported by the MRC Argenteuil regional government AND the Miller landowner, forestry operator Michel Brunet (9007 2224 Quebec Inc.).
Asked and answered. Canada Carbon offered access, and Arnold turned it down. From the Company's most recent MD&A:
"In the absence of co-facilitation, both parties developed their own draft protocols for dialogue. The protocols developed by Canada Carbon were based on what the Company considers to be best practices. Both parties have had a chance to review each other’s protocols. The first meeting between Canada Carbon’s management and representatives from GSLR was held on July 27, 2021 in GSLR to discuss the protocols. To the extent that GSLR is interested in the same information that will be submitted to CPTAQ, Canada Carbon has agreed to invite GSLR’s experts to observe the field work required for its future CPTAQ submission. In addition, input from GSLR’s experts will be requested. As with all previous studies, the data will be made public and shared with the municipality. Both parties agreed to continue dialogue. In November 2021, GSLR notified the Company that it would not allow its experts to work with, or provide input to, Canada Carbon."
smashedpotatoes wrote:
2) CCB cooperate with GSLR and the MRC Argenteuil regional government in the enactment of the TIAM by MERN to protect GSLR public and private properties, lakes, rivers, and farming areas, as proposed in the MRC Argenteuil public consultations of December 2019.
Canada Carbon dropped about 75% of its claims (which were exempt from TIAM) so that they could be covered under the MRC's application. Those include the claim under your mother's cottage, BTW.. You should be asking the MRC why it hasn't updated its TIAM application file.