Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Canada Carbon Inc V.CCB

Alternate Symbol(s):  BRUZF

Canada Carbon Inc. is a Canada-based mining exploration and development company. The Company is focused on the acquisition, exploration and development of graphite deposits. It holds a 100% interest in two graphite properties located in Quebec: the Miller Graphite Project located in Grenville-Sur-La-Rouge and the Asbury Graphite Mine located in Notre-Dame-du-Laus. The Miller hydrothermal lump-vein historical graphite mine and surrounding property covers approximately 100 square kilometers (km2) and is located around 80 km west of Montreal in the Grenville Township. The Asbury Graphite Mine property is made up of two claims for a total of 119 hectares (ha). The Mine is located around 8.1 kilometers (km) northeast of Notre-Dame-Du-Laus in the Laurentides Region of southern Quebec.


TSXV:CCB - Post by User

Comment by I8thestockon Jul 15, 2022 1:15pm
101 Views
Post# 34827405

RE:Protocols and meetings

RE:Protocols and meetingsBullfrog in a small pond.  Stop with the nonsense Alex. So let me understand this. 
1) Ellerton established a meeting and travelled to Qbc only for it to be cancelled at the last minute because there was no "agenda".  Arnold and his remarkable staff could have contacted the CEO a few days or weeks sooner to let him know before cancelling at the last minute.  What a professional move by Tom
2) An agenda was submitted but because it didnt align with the mysterious outline in Tom's head, its been rejected. Don't you think Tom could have submitted the outline he was looking for before hand? Tell Tom to create an outline that appeals to him and maybe there could be some traction
3) Don't give us the protocol BS.  Its a town of 2000 individuals.  Get real Alex.  No one on this forum has ever supported what you say. Can't wait for rational individuals on the provincial level to get ahold of this.  

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>