RE: RE: Peters, Anon 2 I realize that Anon is not likely a single entity or if it is is not likely representing a single entity. In any case whoever is selling through Anon does not include insiders and that's encouraging.
Meantime we have a few ( 2,3,4?) brokers buying for people eager enough to pay 13 when they could, if they cooperated, get the stock realized through exercise @ 12.5 . I see significance in the 1/2-penny.
House Positions for C:CEX from 20120516 to 20120516 |
77 Peters |
640,500 |
83,265 |
0.13 |
0 |
|
640,500 |
-83,265 |
7 TD Sec |
455,500 |
59,215 |
0.13 |
5,000 |
650 |
0.13 |
450,500 |
-58,565 |
62 Haywood |
325 |
42 |
0.129 |
0 |
|
325 |
-42 |
2 RBC |
0 |
|
325 |
42 |
0.129 |
-325 |
42 |
79 CIBC |
0 |
|
6,500 |
845 |
0.13 |
-6,500 |
845 |
85 Scotia |
30,000 |
3,900 |
0.13 |
50,000 |
6,500 |
0.13 |
-20,000 |
2,600 |
83 Mackie |
0 |
|
23,000 |
2,990 |
0.13 |
-23,000 |
2,990 |
68 Leede |
0 |
|
70,000 |
9,100 |
0.13 |
-70,000 |
9,100 |
99 Jitney |
11,000 |
1,430 |
0.13 |
105,000 |
13,650 |
0.13 |
-94,000 |
12,220 |
1 Anonymous |
0 |
|
877,500 |
114,075 |
0.13 |
-877,500 |
114,075 |
TOTAL |
1,137,325 |
147,852 |
0.13 |
1,137,325 |
147,852 |
0.13 |
0 |
0 |