Does my math make sense?In the interview in London, Mark mentioned the potential revenue stream from capturing carbon using the tailings. He thinks that 8-10 kg of carbon per ton is realistic and with 4.6kg needed to get to net zero, it would leave ~5kg on the table. Each kg translates into 900,000 tons of carbon over the lifetime of the mine.
That means:
5 x 900,000 tons x $130 per ton = $585 Mio
This assumes that Canada is extending the carbon credit program beyond 2030 as the lifetime of the mine would be way longer.
Does this make sense?