Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Canada Nickel Company Inc V.CNC

Alternate Symbol(s):  CNIKF

Canada Nickel Company Inc. is a Canada-based company, which is engaged in advancing the nickel-sulfide projects to deliver nickel required to feed the electric vehicle and stainless-steel markets. The Company owns flagship Crawford Nickel-Cobalt Sulphide Project in the heart of the prolific Timmins-Cochrane mining camp. The Company also owns 25 additional nickel targets located near the Crawford Project. Its wholly owned NetZero Metals Inc. to develop zero-carbon production of Nickel, Cobalt and Iron and applied for the trademarks NetZero Nickel NetZero Cobalt and NetZero Iron across several jurisdictions.


TSXV:CNC - Post by User

Comment by N3tPr0pheton Nov 08, 2022 12:40pm
194 Views
Post# 35082472

RE:RE:RE:RE:Brandy

RE:RE:RE:RE:BrandyLooks like Skarn calculated the CO2 estimations for both companies and FLYN is 0.99 tonnes of CO2 per tonne Nickel equivalent, as compared to CNC's 2.05.

Importantly, carbon sequestration seems applicable to both companies but is not factored into these numbers.

I've been told by posters on this board that my math skills are below that of a second grader, so it's probably worth getting a second opinion. Is 0.99 less than half of 2.03?

EndZonefor7 wrote: Not seeing any net zero carbon in their info. Old project and half undergound by looks of it. Correct me if I'm wrong. 
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>