GREY:CIMVF - Post by User
Comment by
fairdinkemon Jan 10, 2018 11:27am
![](https://assets.stockhouse.com/kentico-cms/0342-00/images/Sprite.svg#id_Post_Views_Icon)
194 Views
Post# 27323590
RE:one share one warrent
RE:one share one warrentI cannot answer that. The fast and high rise in PPS i have seen such before. That to say in most cases it was known by a good number of people that would acumulate shares even with the share and warrant issue. That because of what in their opinion i can only assume was an irrelavent issue in this case because of the lo share issue count. If such a new project is in sight and some assume that it is a go then they will jump all over the PPS ahead of any deal, expecting that their hoped for event will occur. In fact i have bought private investments just on that stature basis and scored "BIG", in fact very BIG.
As for Edwards and Jarvis, they both cast a very LONG and TALL SHADOW. IMO their moves are always based on as near as 100% probability to occur and are as well very strategic no matter how muddy the waters are or have been. They seem to have great foresite as CEO's. AIMHO!