RE: Buyout BuyersContinuation: I want to start summarizing my posts.
1. To help you understand me better:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AC7ANGMy0yo
2. See older post about the Green movement conspiracy and watch that video.
Back Ground Info:
Investment implies moving some part of one’s assets from financial safety to a position of acceptable risk with the hope of increasing wealth over time. What qualifies as “acceptable risk” may thus be seen to be the gating question for the investment criteria of a “prudent man”. This has come to be known as the Prudent Man Rule to guide persons entrusted with the finances of others.
Although the rule remains a guiding principle in the fund management industry to this day, at least one key element has changed. In 1971, our understanding of ultimate safety was transformed when President Nixon ended the US government’s certification that each dollar in circulation was, in effect, worth exactly 1/35th of an ounce of gold.
Since all major currencies had been linked to gold via the US dollarsince 1945, when the US held the majority of monetary reserves, the announcement provoked a momentous change in the financial culture. Cash no longer meant gold: the amount of dollars the Federal Reserve could print would not be restricted to some degree by a stored metallic tangible asset with a finite supply. In a great leap of faith, paper dollars and traded US federal liabilities became “risk-free” assets while gold, long regarded as money itself, was disdained as a “commodity”, a volatile “risk asset”.
READ THIS. https://www.bullionbullscanada.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=17565:the-great-gold-bait-and-switch&catid=48:gold-commentary&Itemid=131
READ THIS, I have mentioned the Council on Foreign Relations in New York before, this is more history lessons:
https://www.silverbearcafe.com/private/01.11/silverstealers.html
WATCH PART 1 AND 2 on movement towards confiscation of all rights:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X7_0HlCwb8A
Watch Collapse : https://fora.tv/2009/02/13/Dmitry_Orlov_Social_Collapse_Best_Practices
Why Copper: I could list many reasons backed by serious intellectual thought even to go so far back as to the roots of exchange. The gift: the form and reason for exchange in archaic societies By Marcel Mauss. But I think we all know why we're here. But this is a digression.
This historically radical new notion was validated by the arbiters of money themselves. Central bankers dumped gold, driving prices down sharply during the 1990s. They thereby reinforced the MBA textbook perceptions that the dollar and US Treasury bonds were “risk-free” assets and gold a “barbarous relic,” as John Maynard Keynes
famously called it.
Even today, as the gold rally has reached the 10-year mark (following a 20-year
bear market), the metal represents a mere 0.6 per cent of total global financial
assets (stocks, bonds and cash). This is near the all-time low (0.3 per cent)
reached in 2001, and significantly below the 3 per cent it accounted for in 1980
and the 4.8 per cent it was in 1968.
However, there are changes afoot. After a lengthy absence, some asset
managers and central bankers are readmitting gold back into the group of
prudent asset classes. Assessing the devastation of financial industry and
government balance sheets, fiduciaries have been reminded that one of the
principle reasons to hold gold – that it is the only major financial asset that does
not represent someone else’s obligation to repay – is not the arcane concept it once appeared.
What I'm alluding to is that we have to see the big picture and realize that global plans are laid out 150-200 years in advance. Ie. Look where the majority of the Nuclear reactors are located. What genius put them all new fault lines and other potential disasters? You must realize you are being socially engineered! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zDZFcDGpL4U Knowing where this is all going and at what stage we are in allows us to profit. (I trust everyone read the book Captains and Kings).
Looking at the intentions and the money flow for the triangle is there any doubt that the NTL will be approved. Sure, for the enjoyment of the public watching the drama, there may be delays but at the end of the day this kind of force can cause the rise and more importantly the fall of nations. Harper is a puppet and they seem to like him. Iggy is a trained dog and they like him too. Only Jack would become a pain so they won't let that happen and if the public votes him in despite the millions they will spend to beat him, I suspect he will die of natural causes.
My tally sheet has over 100 billion dollars on it and growing! I hope I’ve made my case by presenting you with what I think are some of the more important facts.
The case for the money:
Soros and two other funds. A Boeing 737 runway. See any of Vette’s super posts.
Maybe next time I’ll turn my attention to Barrick unless there is an expert in the house who would like to show why I think they will be involved.