Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Copper Fox Metals Inc V.CUU

Alternate Symbol(s):  CPFXF

Copper Fox Metals Inc. is a resource company, which is focused on copper exploration and development in Canada and the United States. The Company’s projects include Schaft Creek, Van Dyke, Sombrero Butte, Mineral Mountain and Eaglehead. The Schaft Creek project covers 56,180 hectares of mineral concessions located in Tahltan Territory in northwestern British Columbia, approximately 60 kilometers south of Telegraph Creek, near existing seaport, transportation and clean hydroelectric energy infrastructure. The Van Dyke project is an advanced stage in-situ copper recovery project located in Miami, Arizona. The Sombrero Butte project is a Laramide age, exploration stage, porphyry copper project located in the Bunker Hill Mining District, 44 miles northeast of Tucson, Arizona. Mineral Mountain is an early-stage Laramide age, porphyry copper exploration project located in the Mineral Mountain Mining District, 20 miles east of Florence, Arizona.


TSXV:CUU - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by RogueWolfon Mar 05, 2012 6:47pm
134 Views
Post# 19629690

RE: RE: RE: RE: Congrats to the IC.....

RE: RE: RE: RE: Congrats to the IC.....

approstophe

lol.

Ask all those investors who paid all the way up to nearly $4 for their shares

$2.75 is as high as I see it going....wheres this $4?

How about you learn now to properly analyze a stock? Your posts where you try to value CUU at $5 or more a share is laughable. As was your analysis of LUN. Absolutely laughable.

CUU will go a lot higher than the $2 bucks you boys are predicting.  My analysis of LUN (as explained twice) was to show that we're a better value per share for the same sized market cap.

I noticed your boy Speccy opined on the "issuing of billions of shares"...where did the IC learn this?  Running the IC lemonade stand?

You've got the best grammar Ive seen so far but that spelling of "apostrophe" made me laugh.

Last time the IC had a cuddle I heard you got to eat the cracker.

The fact that you people take the word of Vette, who has not made a single correct call with CUU in nearly a year. How many posts has Vette claimed big buyers were about to buy but it never happened? How many posts has Vette claimed there would be big buying following a conference or trade show that never happened? How many times has Vette said RE or BFS was "on time" and it was delayed? It's laughable how consistently Vette, FoxyRoller, Orificeface, Kelownaclown, and you are wrong.

Why bring Vette up?  Ive admitted that AG has a stupidly positive view on CUU...there are clearly a lot of misrepresented facts there, but a deposit of this size is worth a ton more than $2 per share for our chunk.  Second youll have to wait til the buyout to see if Im wrong about my pricing, Im not hyping trade shows bumping the price or instituions picking up the stock having dramatic effects.


   Wasting lives? How many posts have you made here recently RogueWolf? Pot meet kettle!

Im not spending every day bashing a stock that I own.....that speaks for itself.

And I got a kick out of your grammar and spelling errors. Especially when you make a bunch of them yourself in just this one post of yours

Its not proper grammar to start a sentance with 'and'.

I bet you're going to lose on purpose at the next cuddle......I bet you want to eat that cracker again.

Lulz-cow

Rogue,

 

Bullboard Posts