RE:10 Years of Tahltan Opposition (Updated May 22, 2021)Wow, that's a lot of history.
IMO what the Tahlthan want is honest, meaningful and transparant communication, just like when
they had
a communications and engagement with HudBay Minerals and Doubleview for the very same Hat property. I'm not sure why the agreement lapsed, but it seems like Doubleview is willing to negotiate and according to their recent news release plans to enter into a communications and engagement agreement, and has sent a written letter indicating this.
"Doubleview takes the TCG’s recent public comments very seriously and humbly recognizes that the TCG has expressed its opposition to the way in which Doubleview has engaged with the Tahltan Nation to-date. Doubleview continues to seek a positive, collaborative, productive, and mutually beneficial relationship with the Tahltan Nation. Doubleview’s intention is to respect the TCG’s engagement protocol by entering into a Communications and Engagement Agreement (the “Agreement”). Doubleview has provided a written response to the Agreement and is awaiting a response back from the TCG. Doubleview sees this as a first step towards re-setting its ongoing engagement with the Tahltan Nation" Doubleview News Release It seems like the agreement they had in place then, was mutually beneficial. (as seen here on the last 2 pages of
the Tahltan 2019 Industry review. ~ interestingly it mentions the
archaeological assessments that
were done during that time. 2019 Tahltan Industry Review Always investigate for yourself before investing.
good luck all.