WHAT WOULD BE NICE ?CLEAN UP - on the entire Del Norte drill intercepts.
new map plotting all the intercepts - so needed.
Just this eve - i was scanning the Del map and something stood out.
DN 20 03 + DN 20 09
Where are they - i mused.
So.. back to searching online - so wanting to know what the drills intercepted.
Why ? Because they would tie in lots of the project.
These holes tap the eagles nest
LG vein + Eagles Nest + K zone and now argo.. would form a hot spot.
Why hasn't DEC compiled all the data - to make sense of the drill hits ?
DN 20 02 + DN 20 03 - would certainly tie the zones together.
Guess where i found these drill holes and - more ?
Tueton's website...lol
Why aren't they on DEC's ?
And, here i thought the Eagles Nest hadn't been tapped.
Ifit were not for spotting the two - holes - on this map - i would have never clued in.
Here's the map - look for the 2 holes -DN 20 - 02 + 03 And.. check out the other holes.
This silver system is larger than i tohught.
Why the hell were they tapping the - 14/oz zone when there's strong silver intercepts
from argo, eagle, and k zone.
DRILL PLOT MAP - ( this map needs updating ) https://orders.newsfilecorp.com/files/3615/74811_decadefigure1.jpg Now... a conversion of, grams, and meters would be - all the better.
Right out of the gates - 102 feet =
31 meter = boom = matches the ARGO.depths.
DEC should be reporting the distance between argo and this DN 02 02 - drill hole
Such provides constraints -
constraints = tonnage = builds resource = hello...!
5.61/oz = 174/grams of silver KOSCIUSZKO (“K”) ZONE-LG VEIN DRILL HOLE SUMMARY | Distance N from K zone & Pad# (feet) | Drill Hole# | Dip Angle (degrees) | From (feet) | To (feet) | Core Interval (feet) | Silver (oz/ton) | Gold (oz/ton) | Gold Equiv.* (oz/ton) |
| 0-“02-1” | 2002- | -45 | 39.0 | 141.0 | 102.0 | 5.61 | 0.104 | 0.198 |
| | 01 | | | | | | | |
| | 2002- | -50 | 65.0 | 172.9 | 107.9 | 5.22 | 0.134 | 0.221 |
| | 02 | | | | | | | |
| | 2002- | -45 | 4.2 | 81.0 | 76.8 | 9.09 | 0.223 | 0.375 |
| | 03 | | | | | | | |
| 1,070–N | 2004- | -58 | 418.6 | 446.8 | 28.2 | 7.89 | 0.088 | 0.222 |
| | 36 | | | | | | | |
| 1,790–L | 2004- | -50 | 332.8 | 340.5 | 7.7 | 28.96 | 0.240 | 0.723 |
| | 32 | | | | | | | |
| | 2004- | -60 | 467.3 | 471.8 | 4.5 | 27.56 | 1.051 | 1.510 |
| | 33 | | | | | | | |
| 1,970–G | 2003- | -56 | | | | No significant results | | |
| | 08 | | | | | | | |
| | 2003- | -70 | | | | No significant results | | |
| | 09 | | | | | | | |
| 2,000–K | 2004- | -51 | 232.6 | 252.8 | 20.2 | 1.87 | 0.059 | 0.090 |
| | 29 | | | | | | | |
| | 2004- | -65 | | | | Hole did not reach target depth due to technical problems |
| | 30 | | | | | | | |
| | 2004- | -72 | 482.9 | 485.9 | 3.0 | 32.56 | 0.201 | 0.743 |
| 31 | | | | | | | | |
| 2003- | | | | | | | | |
| 2,200–F | 01 | -45 | 12.2 | 20.0 | 7.8 | 16.48 | 0.315 | 0.590 |
| | 2003- | -55 | 18.4 | 28.4 | 10.0 | 15.9 | 0.278 | 0.543 |
| | 02 | | | | | | | |
| | 2003- | -65 | 41.5 | 47.6 | 6.1 | 7.06 | 0.406 | 0.524 |
| | 03 | | | | | | | |
| | 2003- | -77.5 | 94.1 | 103.1 | 9.0 | 13.01 | 0.093 | 0.310 |
| | 04 | | | | | | | |
| 2,310–E | 2004- | -45 | 217.0 | 218.6 | 1.6 | 53.73 | 0.490 | 1.386 |
| | 16 | | | | | | | |
| | 2004- | -55 | 272.3 | 275.9 | 3.6 | 16.29 | 0.430 | 0.701 |
| | 18 | | | | | | | |
| | 2004- | -62.5 | 388.3 | 417.0 | 28.7 | 14.86 | 0.206 | 0.454 |
| | 20 | | | | | | | |
| | Includes… | 388.3 | 397.4 | 11.1 | 41.85 | 0.571 | 1.268 | |
| 2,410–M | 2004- | -55 | 722.4 | 726.0 | 3.6 | 1.17 | 0.036 | 0.056 |
| | 34 | | | | | | | |
| | 2004- | -65 | 133.1 | 141.1 | 8.0 | — | 0.152 | 0.152 |
| | 35 | | | | | | | |
| 2,490–D | 2004- | -55 | | | No significant results | | | |
| | 24 | | | | | | | |
| | 2004- | -70 | 320.8 | 321.8 | 1.0 | 55.01 | 0.185 | 1.102 |
| | 26 | | | | | | | |
| | | 349.6 | 350.3 | 0.7 | 56.10 | 0.248 | 1.184 | |
| | 2004– | -80 | 529.2 | 536.0 | 6.8 | 1.81 | 0.060 | 0.090 |
| | 28 | | | | | | | |
| 2,720–C | 2004- | -65 | 317.0 | 319.4 | 2.4 | 27.95 | 0.270 | 0.466 |
| | 01 | | | | | | | |
| | 2004- | -75 | 48.7 | 500.5 | 11.8 | 8.67 | 0.244 | 0.389 |
| | 02 | | | | | | | |
| | 2004- | -60 | | | Less than 20% core recovery in zone | | | |
| 03 | | | | | | | | |
| 2004- | | | | | | | | |
| 2,870–B | 04 | -60 | 340.9 | 351.2 | 10.3 | 18.69 | 0.358 | 0.669 |
| | 2004- | -70 | | | | Less than 20% core recovery in zone | | |
| | 05 | | | | | | | |
| | 2004- | -75 | | | | Less than 20% core recovery in zone | | |
| | 06 | | | | | | | |
| | 2004- | -65 | 372.0 | 376.6 | 4.6 | 5.72 | 0.143 | 0.238 |
| | 10 | | | | | | | |
| 2,990–A | 2003- | -60 | 222.4 | 226.0 | 3.6 | 76.41 | 0.416 | 1.689 |
| | 05 | | | | | | | |
| | 2003- | -70 | 398.6 | 401.9 | 3.3 | 34.33 | 0.451 | 1.023 |
| | 06 | | | | | | | |
| | 2003- | -75 | 475.7 | 480.6 | 4.9 | 39.26 | 0.337 | 0.991 |
| | 07 | | | | | | | |
| 3,133–J | 2004- | -60 | 209.9 | 213.4 | 3.5 | 9.21 | 0.262 | 0.416 |
| | 07 | | | | | | | |
| | 2004- | -70 | 262.1 | 266.7 | 4.6 | 18.67 | 0.201 | 0.512 |
| | 08 | | | | | | | |
| | 2004- | -77.5 | | | | Did not reach target depth | | |
| | 09 | | | | | | | |
| | 2004- | -85 | 311.7 | 315.6 | 3.9 | 17.1 | 0.146 | 0.430 |
Cheers...
wakey, wakey, shareholders...
investors should be asking for updated maps with drill intercepts.
So, investors can begin - deciphering how large this silver / gold system really is...
Matching the 30m or more intercepts fro margo to eagle to k zone.
All this former data from - Teuton - should be incorporated into DEC's current dril ldata.
All cleaned up... looking pretty / purdy.