RE:RE:RE:News is bad short term, good long termgramara wrote: Toptenconcepts wrote: did not check if the capacity to handle expansion this is terrible
What do you mean by this?
Regarding licensing/security, I agree this is the downside to this move. Hopefully the time saved by retrofitting vs the build-out from scratch that would have to be done at Duncan will make up for it.
I am a a long term holder and I mean management did not fully scope expansion plans at Duncan if you read between the lines both industrial power and build time are problems at Duncan ... another issue is the reference to high quality dry buds .. my immediate thoughts is the 300 kg at Duncan good enough to sell if so we’re is announce ment just very wary of this sudden change of location
fingers crossed ser it works. I am holding another 12 months