RE:RE:RE:Too much good news coming to drop much lower!uptown59 wrote: DBC, I agree with your take, but would like to add. In reality any supplier agreements at this point will be experimental. No retailer is going to commit to quantities of anything without sales data to support volumes. But, these types of things have to start somewhere and that is significant.
As far as MMJ, it’s true that they have aprox. 15% ownership, but for now it appears that they are good with the way things are unfolding. Some of their other assets are doing well and HVT has performed significantly with substantial cash and quality management. I would hope that soon other institutions would ante up and would bet this will be the case.
How do you oust an underperforming CEO, lots of ways, no worries.
Your right about the CFO and Satipharm announcement being a wash, i’m sure Grant hoped that would be the case, I again would bet that the negating announcement was a decision that they were not planning on
GLTAL
Mmj has 56 million shares .. about 30% ..after dva will have 26% of hvt ... they have to hold till at least 3 or 4 dollars to get there return as a investment company. I think the magic number for them is 5 bucks a share then watch them sell out once they hit a trigger point ... Lisa is a job hopper that’s it ..
as as far as the supplier agreement it’s all standard stuff .. the customers want more we will put more on the shelf just like any retailers... Q3 needs to be good again and they need to do and Announcements that says they r up 3000 kg and lucky lake is complete..go grant