RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:SP for coming week???I don't need to say much about the dilution as Marshall covered it on the Agoracom interview and has justified it, but I will.
Again, he has knowledge of information that we don't. Maybe the cash is earmarked for another acquistion that has yet to be announced. Companies grow through acquisitions and they often do that by diluting shares. The fact that a mico cap company has the option to dilute or pay in cash for an acquisition is extremely impressive. Something you guys clearly don't get. The company is also uplisting to the TSX and needs to meet certain criteria. Cash being one of them.
In the end, the dilution will all be relative to their revenue. Does anyone really care if a company has 2 billion shares outstanding if it's pulling in $40 billion in revenue and has a stock price of $30.00? I doubt it. So if DM were to bring in through their verticals a future revenue in the 100's millions, then the dilution is completely worth it. That's growth!
This is a growing stock and you guys are attempting to judge the company and the recent dilution for an acquisition with no clue of what the potential revenue could be. And just to show how little you guys know, institutions consider a clean balance sheet to be one of the most important things in regards to a company. DM's acquisition of EV Connect solutions has no debt, so no debt has been added to DM's clean and lean balance sheet. And you don't think $20 + million in the bank of a micro cap company is not impressive? That's from revenue, not a financing!
Yeehaw1 wrote: all he says in his all posts that they have clean balance sheet with 20+ in their bank
... he can't answer any thing related to dilution.
Iamapothead wrote:
Investor10X wrote: Iamapothead wrote: Bentley2000 wrote: Any guess out there what we can expect....plz take into consideration if we migrate to TSX and news releases....could be a big week..... .25???
I'm still on the fence. My hunch is that we won't see anything more than $.20 until after the uplist. Unfortunately Marshall and DM have a bit of a legacy to overcome as well they continue to do business in a manner that leave shareholders relying on personal beliefs hunches, and feelings. Until they start realeasing real exciting news that is backed with detailed info and revenue guidance I can't see the SP climbing too hard and fast. However, I'd love to be wrong about that.
After the uplist, who knows what will happen. I anticipate the uplist to have a positive impact but exactly how much it will help is anyone's guess. I'm hopeful that an uplist will attract institutional and more sophisticated investors who can really rip this thing apart with better DD. What I continually see here amongst us retail investors is petty squabbles between pumpers, bashers, and fence sitters. None of us regardless of our attempts are offering up any real concrete evidence or unrefutable DD. Currently this investment is still very much about how much do you believe Marshall. Nothing more, nothing less.
GLTA.
What a load of cr@p, that's an insult to a number of us that have taken the time to crunch the numbers time and time again and provide "real concrete evidence" on this board of how this stock stacks up to other companies in the various industries that DM competes with. I don't expect that you can ever appreciate the amount of work it takes to do this, as you've probably never done the work yourself. And if you have, you've never shared it on this board.
In addition to that, a number of us read the financial reports and help breakdown a lot of those numbers that not all investors understand. At the same time we continually debunk a lot of the junk the bashers try to pass off to mislead or confuse investors or potential investors.
You don't need to work at an institution to do the math. The numbers that a bunch of us provide are not based on hunches or personal beliefs they are objectively determined by the information given in the financials. And though it is also okay to speculate with fellow investors and provide opinions or beliefs, we unfortuantely, have a few that show up only to mislead or scare investors with misinformation and disinformation. They often try to mask their participation by pretending to be a "concerned" investor, throwing out ridiculous types of questions with the purpose to raise doubt or scare. They never or rarely answer any of the questions poised to them or provide answers or solutions to their concerns.
It is important to listen to the CEO of the company, but be aware that there are some very sketchy CEO's out there that do exaggerate or even lie to investors. Marshall has not been one of those CEO's, he has been upfront and honest about the things he can talk about and provides investors a once-a-month forum (i.e. discord) to ask questions about the company.
Why should investors believe him?
Because he has proven that the information that he has provided to the shareholders has come true again and again. It may not happen in the time frame that you may want, but it happens! Marshall often confirms or debunks the information that many of us discuss on the board. It's what often shuts up the bashers. So yes, I do believe in a lot of what he says because he hasn't given us reason not to and the numbers often back up his claims. If I didn't believe in the management I wouldn't be invested in this stock. But to say that this investement is based primarily on believing in Marshall... no... not at all. The clean balance sheet, the AI technology, the verticals and generally the numbers have been the main reason most of us are invested in this company.
I've struck a nerve with someone. I could break your little essay down one paragraph at a time for you. Or better yet, just let you think about what you posted.