Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Diaz Resources Ltd V.DZR



TSXV:DZR - Post by User

Post by qwqwon Apr 26, 2012 2:45pm
97 Views
Post# 19840174

Macklin

Macklin

The first Macklin well  produced 7000 bbls in under 3 months.The second and third Macklin wells produced over 6000 bbls each in 2 months.With $60 field netbacks those 3 wells would bring in enough cashflow in their first 3 months to almost cover half of their $1 mil per well drilling costs.If that isn't a license to print money,what is? 

It takes about 17000 bbls of production per well to cover the $1 mil drilling costs.Assuming it takes 9 months production to reach 17000 bbls,every bbl after that is bonus.These wells normally produce from 50000 - 100000 bbls over their lifetime,that leaves 33000 - 83000 bbls apo.Since Saskatchewan has oil royalties of 2% on the first 37,000 boes of production,the next 20000 bbls from the Macklin wells still have only 2% royalties. Is Saskatchewan too generous?????? Obviously with these metrics who needs Alchemists.

 

 

 

 


 

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>