RE:RE:Mark Lackey on "Straight Talk"Talking about "get their story out", who do we give credit to for this coverage?
Back in January Tangent Management Corp. were appointed "for the enhancement of the Company's image "
Anyone spotted any coverage since then?Certainly they don't seemed to have acted to improve the Enpar web site (well, not obvious to me).
Looking at
www.tangentmanagementcorp.com I am uninspired that they don't seem to have updated their website since 2008!
Mark Lackey's blog says ENP are not a client https://chfcapital.com/blog/, see two entries for Oct 7th. In the video he mentions Enpar were found in his "model ... screens".
The blog also claims more forthrightly talks about the impending requirement to remove ammonia:
"New legislation in Canada will require removal of ammonia from some very large mining operations by 2016 and Enpar’s patented technology is the best technology."
Which is not something Enpar has mentioned to us at all I think, is it true? How much affect could it have on sales?
Does this suggest CHF capital are pitching for business? They failed to spike the sp if that was one hope.
And about the temperature advantage claimed over Biochemical, I wasn't aware of that as a major USP, was anyone else. But if I'd read the Q1 MD&A (came out while I was on vacaction! that's my excuse and I'm sticking to it) I would have been reminded of
" A major advantage of the AmmEL System is that its operational efficiency is not affected by low temperature. Therefore, it is especially well suited to water treatment markets in temperate climatic zones where water temperatures typically decline to slightly above freezing during the winter months. " (and has been stated before).
But what about the opening part of this section where it talks about the 100k litre ammonia-treating AmmEL demo to Ontario run in 2012. Why no sales?
And Chna's HYBTEC has been running a pilot since sometime after March 2013, I wonder how that is going?
And in April 2013 after six months of successful testing a 100k ESD for nitrate and sodium removal was de-commissioned at a Guelph pump and booster station, apparently " Data has been analyzed and indicates that targets set out for nitrate and sodium reduction have been met ", and it was at a low power consuption. But none sold, why?
I had kind of forgotten there have already been (at least) two pilots that have concluded without any obvious follow-on sales, anyone got any thoughts?