RE:SEDAR FILING Teach us more master. Do you know if that chemical processing plant gets built on site or elsewhere? Also it surprised me that in the risk factors section there weren't any specific mining business related risk factors, say like the ability (or not) to secure permits etc. I'm not saying these are high risks necessarily just find it strange those sorts of things aren't in the SEDAR document.
Buffalo1956 wrote: The latest sedar filing describes under page 6 the "USE OF PROCEEDS " , most ( over $10 million) is for a 50,000 ton per year chemical demonstration plant to produce lithium hydroxide and carbonate that HAS to be done for the DFS . If they had waited till after the PFS it would have delayed the DFS which would have delayed the final production timeline. So all you nay sayers need to grow a pair and admit you have no idea what it takes to develop a real mining company and write an apology letter to the management team at Frontier Lithium for your uninformed , off the wall , ridiculous comments .