Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Gold Canyon Resources Inc V.GCU



TSXV:GCU - Post by User

Comment by Schillon Sep 29, 2014 7:45pm
129 Views
Post# 22981006

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Let's put this into Perspective

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Let's put this into Perspective
Curvature wrote: Schill If you invest 50k dollars the risk is the same no matter what you pay for the stock ie if you paid a buck and it goes to 0 or you paid .10 and it goes to 0. Zero is Zero so your risk is your investment 50k.

Following this argumentation buying physical gold is ar the same risk as buying a house and buying a car and buying stocks and buying treasuries:
if the gold is stolen, the risk is 100%. If a fire or earthquake happens, the loss is 100%. Buying a car and driving on a road: risk 100%.
Even the whole life is all the time at a risk of 100% loss.
I do not view it that way.
I think the lower the price paid compared to several metrics, the better the deal is and therefore, the lower the risk.
Buying 100.000 shares of GCU at C$4 or C$2 was much more risky than buying 100.000 shares at current prices.
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>