RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Updated In-situ Gold Valuation To all that provide motivation and speculative imagination for this story. I really do appreciate it. You people are good at bringing that forward. That said, I would like to participate in your enthusiasm but because the BLOCK MODEL still is what it is and the rest of the story still is covered with thick clouds of promises, how can I go from step ONE to step TWO without questions.
As I mentioned, the conversion of the BLOCK MODEL to 43-101 brought me and I'm sure many others here. When I look at the whole picture of one year of money spent and plans that didn't(?) around the principal catalyst that would propel this story to the next level, One has to be very cautious. Look at it, they(Mgmts) go to the market and get more money( hundreds, millions) for their story and, get this, THEIR PAY CHEQUES, on top of that, they participate in financing and give THEMSELVES OPTION PACKAGES that some times are unrealistic according to any standards. In the mean time all of us, on the outside, have to earn our $$, a few at a time to put in play. So, I say let the company provide the market with what is needed for the market to reward the share price. Should this be missed, let's all get on the phones, in person, in writing and demand from Magmt(here or any other story) answers. As for this story, we all got the explanations as to why the first attempt didn't work. Until that time all the best and happy trading to all that play fair.