Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Geomega Resources Inc V.GMA

Alternate Symbol(s):  GOMRF

Geomega Resources Inc. is a Canada-based company. The Company is engaged in the acquisition, exploration and evaluation of mining properties in Canada. The Company's wholly owned subsidiary Innord Inc, which is engaged in developing technologies for extraction and separation of rare earth elements and other critical and strategic metals from its mining properties and other mining and industrial waste. The Company owns Montviel property, which is located approximately 100 km north of Lebel-sur-Quevillon and 45 km west of the Cree First Nation of Waswanipi. The Montviel property comprises 96 mining claims totaling 5,333 hectares. The project is comprised of 178 cells, for a total of approximately 9,910 hectares.


TSXV:GMA - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Post by ProOrbiteon Oct 01, 2019 6:23pm
147 Views
Post# 30184420

Specifically Who, Where, How Much? = Geomega?

Specifically Who, Where, How Much? = Geomega?Interesting point a while back on another BB. I like his thinking. If you take each line and compare it to Geomega does it or doesnt it fit the bill? But Geomega is focusing on HHREE. Also Not focusing on one customer either. Unless exclusive deal is made. Will or will not DOD step up and take some? Will they also invest? I hope so and still believe that EU is prime market and then the USA and then others. Thoughts?

ausheds wrote: Great to see some constructive thinking, but I'd suggest you are coming at it from the wrong end, which is the biggest flaw across virtually all RE discussion/analysis.

The real Q is what is the scale of potential revenues, the volume of identified demand in the first year of operation x conservatively estimated prices at that point, then perhaps extended out Y3 or Y5 with again conservative growth numbers.

Once you have your revenue lines you can then look to see if you can build & service a profitable business within those parameters.

Conversely the Govt/DoD will be looking to establish their demand profile > see the 2016 GAO report to understand what a dog's breakfast that is:   https://www.gao.gov/assets/680/675165.pdf  

If you work their 1% of US demand that's just 98t 2018!

Obviously they will set their sights far higher than that but without the middle supply chain to manufacture REO to product and the likely 5 - 10yr program to build that out at any scale how high will they go for the first 5yrs? 1000t? 2000t? With most of it going into stockpile.

1000t x $30kg average value = $30Mpa divided among the number of suppliers that can step up around benchmark pricing, and no one company is likely to win it all.

What level of support would the Govt be likely to invest to get that value in return?

Best operating margin that could be forecast would range 30/40% but let's settle for $10M of the $30Mpa.

What sort of RE business could be built on gross profit of $10Mpa?

And before any start waving the magic wand re "other" customer I'll restate one of the first Q I put here > Specifically Who, Where, How Much?

This is the conundrum RE, tiny mkt, with very narrow points of entry (none in the US bar catalysts), and very high establishment costs with long lead times to steady state revenues.

Why Moly tanked, and why Lynas came perilously close but for 850t of on spec NdPr June 2015 that got the Japanese back onside, 2.5yrs after start up
Read more at https://stockhouse.com/companies/bullboard?symbol=v.ucu&postid=30100439#OVjdTtRykZt5Kb6v.99


On page 6. Of the Corporate presentation.
 
Preliminary estimates based on production of 1.5 tonnes per day!
 
Full plant feed throughput = 1.5 tpd
Average grade of feed stock = 30% TREO (Nd, Pr, Dy, Tb)
Capital costs = $1 MM to $2 MM
Direct operating costs =$3 / kg of TREO
Construction period =  up to 9 months
Sales= $10.2 MM
Cost of Sales =$340 K
Cost of Goods Sold = $7.4 MM
Contribution margin= 24%
Capital payback= 1 to 2 years

https://ressourcesgeomega.ca/wp-content/uploads/Corp_Pres/GEOMEGA_EN_LD.pdf

Now with additional through put!

https://ressourcesgeomega.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/2019-09-30-Engineering_EN-1.pdf


No investment advice at all. Do your own DD. Just my opinions!
Bullboard Posts