Post by
tarsands on Jul 20, 2020 12:21pm
Well he would know alot more then myself
For sure on that!
They use ALS Labs in Vancouver and they also use Bureau Veritas Minerals, Richmond B.C. for metallurgical testing.
The comparison too the 2018 returns of core results, was or might be misleading because I found out by reading more that they drilled PQ core which is :
(The Company drilled its first two holes of the 2018 season on the Herbert property from the S Pad with the central Deep Trench Vein as the target. This vein is the southern-most of the three major veins which have been discovered and drill-tested to date. The holes were drilled with larger, PQ-sized core for the purpose of obtaining a bigger sample through the vein intercepts which yield more accurate assay results and also upon which metallurgical testing can be accomplished.)
A much larger size.
The most common diameter sizes of core are NQ and CHD 76.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exploration_diamond_drilling
The Company drilled its first two holes of the 2018 season on the Herbert property from the S Pad with the central Deep Trench Vein as the target. This vein is the southern-most of the three major veins which have been discovered and drill-tested to date. The holes were drilled with larger, PQ-sized core for the purpose of obtaining a bigger sample through the vein intercepts which yield more accurate assay results and also upon which metallurgical testing can be accomplished.
Also above they say they drilled the southern most veins from the pad. With PQ sized core , so all in all it would take more time too drill the furtherest vein structures with such a big sized drill core.
So yes if Ian is drilling this time the nearest vein structures from their pad and using a sized core bit that is not as large in diameter such as the PQ core then yes it is possible AND probable that your timeline is a TRUE possibiltiy.