Greenbriar Sustainable Living Inc V.GRB

Sage Ranch

[Hubbie87]

 

 

Shneps,

 

Again you fail to post the entire written discussion from the Planning Director Jay Schlosser to the Planning Commission last week.

 

Jay stated verbatim:

 

Jay responded to questions from commissioners and noted that the lawsuit does not prevent the developer from moving forward with the project.

 

“Our legal team tells me that state law is very clear that a project may advance until the court says otherwise,” he said. “And the court hasn’t even reviewed (the) documents yet. So there is no reason they could not advance the project over the last year.”

 

So Shneps, if the City says the project is going forward and the Water Districts action against the City does not stop Sage Ranch and Greenbriar is spending the big bucks doing the detailed engineering work, how in the world can Captiva serve force majeure on Greenbriar or the City

 

You prove constantly you do not post completely what you Google. 

 

Captiva is out of money for a long time. It lost its interest. It's only hope is kindness from GRB to let it have its money back. IMHO

[shneps]

It was GRB that requested the extension based on the legal dispute not the City. I don't dispute the project can't move forward at all. My point is that Jeff denies there is any legal dispute. Please post your link to the quotation from Jay Schlosser as I don't see anything directly quoted from Jay in the October 10th meeting.

[SvenVandeBroek]

Actually found that quote (that Hubbie87 posted) right in under a minute... Your googling and analytical/reasoning skills seem to be semantic satiations for lack of better words, shneps. It really does get boring (after around 450 times of wasting our time during the past year, so I will NOT give you the link). From that same link: 'the commission approved the extension by a 4-0 vote&

[Hubbie87]

Its an interesting form of 'DD' which gets proven to be wrong every time. Like a student that studies unendingly for every test, just to get an 'F' every time.

[shneps]

Honestly not sure of what was incorrect about the post at all. Besides you playing the "deny all facts", "never admit you're wrong" game. What's your point.

[Hubbie87]

Doesn't seem like anyone cares about your thoughts, feelings, opinions, questions, 'DD', judgements, or tantrums there Shnoops.You are like a spam phone caller who refuses to take GRB off the call list.

[shneps]

I had a lot more respect for you then that reply Sven. Shame

[shneps]

And actually it took 0.71 seconds to copy and paste.

[shneps]

That was from The Tehachapi News, just yesterday afternoon. No I didn't present the most up to the minute news. " Again you fail to post the entire written discussion from the Planning Director Jay Schlosser to the Planning Commission last week." I never saw this article until five minutes ago. Read the full article and asked why Jeff was stating the legal dispute doesn't

[nbinvestor11]

To be fair to shneps - He has a valid point about the lawsuit (not saying it will go forward or anything will happen.) All Jeff needed to say is there is a "lawsuit which we believe is without merit and our attorneys are working on it" - This happens ever day with land deals. All I seen(I could be wrong) - Jeff has said multiple times GRB is not involved in any lawsuits. NB

[shneps]

Thank you nbinvestor11, and yes you are correct about Jeff's statements.

[shneps]

Jeff also commented that a settlement deal had been submitted to the City for a resolution by the Water District. Why did the City decline the settlement offer?

[nbinvestor11]

Shneps: There many reasons why the city declined the settlement offer - not all offers are fair offers. Let's say they (this is makeup offer) asked Sage Ranch reduce the number of houses from 995 to 100. This would not be a fair offer. NB

[nbinvestor11]

On a different note: Any ideas how many refundable deposits they have taken on Sage??? This information would be very helpful to see how the demand is looking for Sage. NB

[shneps]

As per Jeff's last post related to the "Pink Report" is the following -  "Greenbriar will decide whether to accept cash reservations from one major corporate employer/buyer, or sell all 144 homes of phase one to a combination of corporate/retail buyers." Below is a good link for information related to the various reports required. Note : "The only Public Report

[shneps]

So, just to respond to this comment -  "So Shneps, if the City says the project is going forward and the Water Districts action against the City does not stop Sage Ranch and Greenbriar is spending the big bucks doing the detailed engineering work, how in the world can Captiva serve force majeure on Greenbriar or the City." There was absolutely never a time I commented the project