Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Greenbriar Sustainable Living Inc V.GRB

Alternate Symbol(s):  GEBRF

Greenbriar Sustainable Living Inc. is a developer of sustainable entry-level housing and renewable energy projects. The Company’s primary business is the acquisition, management, development, and possible sale of real estate and renewable energy projects. It operates through three segments: real estate development in the United States (Real Estate), solar energy projects in Puerto Rico (Solar Energy) and corporate headquarters located in Canada (Corporate). The Company is focused on building two large-scale projects, namely Sage Ranch in Tehachapi, California and Montalva in Guanica, Puerto Rico. Sage Ranch is a real estate community of over 995 entry-level homes in the Tehachapi Valley, a community located in southern California. Its Montalva property (1,747 acres) is a large utility-scale solar and battery storage building with an initial size of 80 MWac or 160 MWdc, located in the southwestern coastal area of Puerto Rico. Its Cordero Ranch property is located in Cedar City, Utah.


TSXV:GRB - Post by User

Comment by SvenVandeBroekon Oct 08, 2023 5:42pm
178 Views
Post# 35675405

RE:RE:kilowatt hours (kWh) of electricity per year?

RE:RE:kilowatt hours (kWh) of electricity per year?Good question, Frosch1.

I have no particular experience in that area but I've tried to come up with a rough ballpark number for you.
Here are my parameters and assumptions. Hopefully they can also help others to make their own (and hopefully better) calculations:

Total DC Capacity (Solar Farm): 162 MW
Total AC Capacity (Interconnection): 80 MW
DC/AC Ratio: 2.03
Battery Capacity: 32 MW (for 4 hours, equivalent to 128 MWh)
 
Solar Irradiance (Southern Puerto Rico): 5.8 kWh/m²/day or 2,118 kWh/m²/year
Solar Panel Type: Jinko Cheetah PERC HC JKM 400M-72HL-V or Trina TSM-DE-(II)-400
Solar Panel Rated Capacity: 400 Watts DC
Solar Panel Voltage: 1,500 volts
Solar Panel Efficiency: 19.88%
Solar Panel Dimensions: 2 x 1 m
Inverter Efficiency: 95% (0.95 as a decimal)
Interconnection Capacity: 80 MW
 
Initial Price per kWh: $0.0985 (9.85 cents)
Price Increase per Year: 0.005 cents per year
Cap Price per kWh: $0.115 (11.5 cents)
 
Number of Years for Initial Period: 25 years
Number of Years for First Extension: 5 years
Number of Years for Second Extension: 5 years


Here's one simplified approach to calculate the possible yearly production:

- 162 MW / 400 W = 406,000 solar panels
- 406,000 panels take up at least 812,000 square meters (tilt and spacing ignored)
- 2,118 kWh/m²/year solar irradiance x 812,000 m² x 0.1988 solar panel efficiency x 0.95 DC to AC conversion efficiency = 324,804,449.76 kWh/year

Assuming all output can also be sold to PREPA (by putting it on the grid using the 115 kV connection) that could possibly equal to a maximum revenue of 31,993,238 USD in production year 1.

 
Important notes:
- One solar panel produces 1,500 Volt DC
- The interconnection to the grid requires AC, for which the produced kWh is the much more interesting number for us, as that is sold to PREPA
- Montalva Solar Farm will be oversized for the grid (162 MW DC versus 80 MW AC) which is not uncommon for very large solar farms. Home installations are usually between 1.1 - 1.3 DC to AC.
- This oversizing is likely done to get a better possible usage of the grid capacity bandwidth throughout the day (as the solar production also varies throughout the day)
- The same applies for the battery part of the project, it's likely used to use the interconnection bandwidth as stable and high as possible
- The solar panels used in these calculations (400 Watt) are likely no longer the best tech option as panels now have increased Wattage/panel at a lower cost

Hope this helps you in the right direction. 

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>