Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

CO2 GRO Inc V.GROW

Alternate Symbol(s):  BLONF

CO2 GRO Inc. is a Canada-based precision ag-tech company. The Company is focused on delivering CO2 Delivery Solutions to the global protected agricultural sector. Its patented technology helps growers increase crop yields and profits by enhancing plant growth, resilience, quality and water-use efficiency through aqueous CO2 misting. It is fostering sustainable agriculture practices and reducing the industry's environmental footprint. The Company operates in Canada, the United States and the European Union.


TSXV:GROW - Post by User

Comment by SmilingDogon Dec 15, 2020 9:30am
90 Views
Post# 32107682

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Lawsuit

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:LawsuitGood catch. Just saw this in the financial filing as well. The highlighted part makes me feel much better about this. Companies will almost never downplay a risk unless they are confident about what they are saying. Otherwise they leave themselves open to additonal litigation down the road - i.e. if the claim goes against them and it does have a "material effect", shareholders could easily sue for misleading statements/etc. If it truly was a risk, they would just simply say "effects are uncertain" - this is assuming they have a good lawyer


In October 2019, the Company was served with a statement of claim filed in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice against the Company and two Officers. The case pertains to alleged breaches of non-competition agreements by these Officers and claims damages and an injunction against them and the Company. The Company’s lawyers are managing the claim and are vigorously defending against this action.

The Company cannot reasonably predict the likelihood or outcome of these activities. The Company does not believe that adverse decisions in any ending or threatened proceedings related to any matter, or any amount which may be required to be paid by reasons thereof, will have a material effect on the financial condition or future results of operations.
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>