RE: RE: Roulston plugging Galway Thanks Schiff. Yes, timing is interesting. I'm still not sure what to make of Calvista picking up the miners (I'm assuming) 20% share of the large northern block. I notice that Calvista doesn't mention who the optionee is.
To answer an earlier question from another poster if this is the disputed claim. No - its not. I skimmed through CVZ's 43-101 report on sedar.com and must admit I learned quite alot (more than anything GWY has provided) and I advise strongly for everyone to read through it as GWY and the history of their claims are mentioned a few times in the doc (see page 19 and 20 especially regarding the disputed claim). I don't think there is any love lost between CVZ and GWY!
If you look at CVZ's website and go the image gallery select maps and select the 3rd image down you'll see the claims labelled 098-68 and 090-68. Claim 090-68 is the disputed claim and I'll assume (although its difficult to tell) because CVZ is calling it theirs that its the pie shaped one on trend. If so that would be very unfortunate if GWY lost it as it would at least give us another 250m of strike. Anyhow, you can read all about it in the 43-101. Its still being disputed, and GWY are trying to proceed in civil court.