GT CHARGE SURVEY 1- As one can see ( previous post ) what trype of acid used toassay copper is imperitive based
on what host rock the copper is inand vased on whar transitional stage copper is in.
2 - Former post - i meant to say... salt alkai waters erroding the copper sulphates or native
copper.
3 - Here is GR's charability map.
Question what charge zone is GT really in ?
I'd take that bet and say.... most would point to - pink or red zones.
But if one proves deeper - and really analyzes the charge map - it's clear the mineralizarion
is in a white zone surrounded by pinks.
white zone is alaki resistivity - weak resistivity.
saddle zone # 2 is also in a weak zone - yellow.
4 - which placesthe whole concept of finding mineralization not nessisarily in
iron hugh charge zones but rather opposite whereas the potentiality of salt waters
solubilizing the copper and repackaging it in a alkai matries.
Would be interesting to compare which labs GT used vs Hawk..
And compare what tests were performed on the samples.
And.. if any remaining cores are left from Hawks drilling d oa retest with
HCl acids...
Pull out Hawks charge map and review the zones in whites and yellows....
Looking for same resistivites.
Heres GT's charge map - what do you see ?
